Incident & Near-Miss Intelligence
Screen high-volume event backlogs, identify potentially serious cases, normalize event context and route the right cases for deeper review.
AI-PSM can support operations, reliability, process safety, assurance and executive risk review using the same governed enterprise evidence plus relevant industry knowledge.
Request a DemoScreen high-volume event backlogs, identify potentially serious cases, normalize event context and route the right cases for deeper review.
Prepare chronology, similar events, missing evidence and candidate causal/contributing factors so investigators start with a stronger evidence package.
Support consistent process-safety indicator workflows and connect Tier 1–4 information to underlying assets, barriers and causes.
Connect incident history with maintenance, inspection and barrier condition to expose recurring equipment-centered risk.
Identify overdue, recurring or potentially ineffective actions and maintain the decision trail behind closure.
Normalize and compare multi-site event and RCFA histories to expose recurring causal patterns, shared equipment and barrier vulnerabilities, lesson-transfer gaps, repeat events and corporate OFIs.
Future participating clients can opt into governed comparison against permissioned, anonymized and aggregated peer PSE and near-miss patterns — expanding learning beyond any one enterprise without exposing another operator’s proprietary event records.
Bring relevant good engineering practice, public incident findings, technical guidance and comparable industry lessons into investigations and enterprise risk reviews so teams can evaluate internal practice against a broader knowledge base.
Test AI-PSM on a known historical dataset: compare prior RCFA findings and corrective actions with additional cross-event patterns, systemic OFIs and relevant industry/RAGAGEP context surfaced by AI-PSM.
Early deployments can stay one step removed from immediate operational control: retrospective analysis, decision preparation, SME review and portfolio intelligence first; higher-consequence automation only after validation, governance and client approval.
Use your own prior investigations as the benchmark, then extend successful learning across sites and into continuous Sentinel monitoring.